Click pictures above for documents
VTA should be forthcoming about the need to have an additional tax for the BART extension, which is nowhere mentioned in its promotional document shown above. It is no longer a secret that VTA is desperate for some kind of electorial victory when its directors cut its meeting short last week in order to rub elbows with the governor lobbying him to sign SB264, even though a 1/8 cent tax isn't enough to build BART and fulfill other 2000 Measure A "promises" such as Caltrain electrification.
VTA should propose spending alternatives under a no-new tax scenario, and reopen transit alternatives for consideration. VTA's spending ability cannot be separated from the project.
As to station area planning, it is unrealistic for VTA to assume it will obtain over 100,000 riders per day largely relying on future developments around the station. San Jose does not have the employment concentration and density like San Francisco, nor has a natural transportation barrier like San Francisco Bay and the Bay Bridge.
Ridership projection, cost effectiveness, and project viability should not be ignored, as much as these planners want you to focus on mickey mouse stuff like station design, etc.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Milpitas City Hall, Committee Meeting Room455
East Calaveras Boulevard, Milpitas
Thursday, October 11, 2007
San Jose City Hall, Wings 118-120
200 E. Santa Clara Street, San Jose
Thursday, October 18, 2007
Santa Clara Senior Citizens Center, Room 232
1303 Fremont Street